American Iatrogenic Association

The unfortunate influence of psychiatry on medical diagnosis

HOW MUCH have physicians been influenced by psychiatric explanations for disease origins? In 1966, it was reported that general practitioners in London were asked what case proportion of 14 conditions was caused by psychogenic(1) factors. They chose either "all cases," "most cases," "some cases," or "no cases," and their responses were weighted and scored. As the chart shows, not one of the 14 conditions was thought in every case to always have a biological cause. Those at the top of the chart were rated as being psychogenic in almost every instance. By the end of the 20th Century it was generally accepted that not a single one of these conditions was psychogenic (and, of course, "liability to accidents" never was a medical condition). Psychiatric explanations for their causes had been thoroughly discredited. But by that time other conditions had replaced those 14, such as irritable bowel syndrome, colitis, allergies, and headaches.

Source: Psychiatric Illness in General Practice, Shepherd,
Cooper, Brown and Kalton; 1966, Oxford University Press. pp. 63-65.

A person who had one of the 13 medical conditions would have been misdiagnosed and mistreated if he was said to have a psychogenic disorder. Research into the genuine causes of the 13 diseases may have been retarded by acceptance of psychiatric explanations for their causation. It took almost 30 years after this survey for doctors to widely accept that most peptic ulcers were caused by a bacterium, and even after the bacterial cause was established many physicians were not properly treating it with curative antibiotics.

In decades prior to this survey, many diseases were misdiagnosed as psychogenic, often with dire consequences for persons so diagnosed. For instance, prevailing medical opinion prior to the 1960s held that epilepsy was evidence of pathological criminality. Epileptics were isolated in "colonies," and many of them were involuntarily sterilized.(2)

Given that psychiatric diagnoses are increasingly popular in Western countries, it is reasonable to ask whether physicians are repeating the diagnostic errors reflected in this survey. Are physicians continuing to ignore genuine physical causes of illnesses, assuming they are psychogenic?

It is undeniably the case that the some diseases are idiopathic(3). Instead of admitting "the cause is unknown," why do physicians habitually claim that idiopathic diseases are psychogenic? Why is there the need to fabricate a mythical explanation where no scientific one yet exists? It seems inconceivable, almost laughable, that many of the 13 diseases could have been considered psychiatric disorders, yet they were, both in England and the United States. Is the repeated diagnosis of physical diseases as psychiatric disorders a form of quackery that will continue to negatively impact medical care?

1. A "psychogenic" illness is defined as one that is mental or emotional rather than physiological in origin.

2. The Epilepsy Foundation of America mentions nothing on its website about the appalling abuses suffered by epileptics. Since the abuses were primarily inflicted by physicians, perhaps the foundation considers discussion of the issue to be in bad taste, possibly causing a loss of support, grants, and donations. Or perhaps the foundation is controlled by physicians who wish the suppress the history of epilepsy.

3. An "idiopathic" disease is one whose cause is unknown.

Cerebral arteriosclerosis.
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Cancer
Epilepsy
Trigeminal neuralgia
Rheumatoid arthritis
Coronary artery disease
Liability to accidents (not a medical condition)
Essential hypertension
Vomiting of pregnancy
Dysmenorrhoea
Eczema
Peptic ulcer
Asthma


Psychiatric quackery, 1948
The following quotes are taken from the book, Synopsis of Psychosomatic Diagnosis and Treatment, published in 1948. It reveals the extent to which psychiatry has historically accepted and promoted health quackery. It is no different today: a disease whose cause is unknown is reflexively assumed to by psychosomatic until the real cause is found.

MANY ULCER patients show in their overt behavior aggressive, ambitious, and independent attitudes. They do not accept help and tend to burden themselves with all kinds of responsibility...Deeply hidden, however, is the person's unconscious longing for the sheltered existence of the little child...This constantly increasing repressed longing is the unconscious psychological factor directly connected with the organic processes which may lead to the ulceration of the stomach or favor the development of ulcer when other factors are brought into play. This explains in part the dramatic therapeutic success often reported as a result of rest cures, during which the patient is able to throw off responsibility and acquire, in a way that seems legitimate, the care and attention which he craves.

Sidney Rubin, M.D.; "Gastrointestinal System," Synopsis of
Psychosomatic Diagnosis and Treatment
, 1948.

THE PICTURE was more complex in the diabetic group, but the evidence
indicated that the patients' difficulties began early in life, and
included anxiety and indecision in the assumption of responsibility and
sexual development, with a tendency to vacillate between dependency and
independence. [Diabetics] were generally more passive than active, more
masochistic than sadistic. Their ego was weak and the characterological
defenses correspondingly weak, and anxiety was frequent and prolonged.
Their social and sexual anxiety limited them in the discharge of
emotional tension. Inability to follow a consistent course of action was
characteristic of them. Dunbar applied the term "muddler" to describe
their mode of action. Their reaction to their illness was frequently one
of depression, and they had a strong paranoid trend with projection.
Robert C. Lowe, M.D.; "Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbances,"
Synopsis of Psychosomatic Diagnosis and Treatment, 1948.

NO DOUBT, further investigation will uncover other means by which
psychic trauma may produce acute and chronic periodontal diseases. It is
my belief that in the complexity of etiological factors of neurotic
gingivitis, emotional tension plays a major role...the field of
psychosomatic dentistry is a fertile one for study and the dentistry is
here presented with another weapon in his rendition of a complete health
service."
Flanders Dunbar, M.D.; "Eye, Ears, Nose, Throat, and Dentition,"
Synopsis of Psychosomatic Diagnosis and Treatment, 1948.


Spreading breast cancer fear, 2002
THERE SEEMS to be no end to the propensity of physicians to attribute physical diseases to "stress," "anxiety," "psychogenic," or "psychosomatic" factors. The evidence for these claims is feeble-to-nonexistent, and they are regularly knocked down by research. Yet the price of these pseudoscientific attributions is improper treatment, frightened patients, and wasted money. How many women were scared into changing their activities to avoid stress, thinking that such stress might cause their cancer to return? Worse yet, how many were put on anti-anxiety drugs, with noteworthy side effects, to tranquilize their risks away? As the following study demonstrates, all this was for naught since the women with the most stress had the lowest rate of recurrence. Will physicians learn from this? Most will probably never learn of it, or hear about it many years hence, while continuing to needlessly frighten women who have cancer. If the case of "stress" ulcer is illustrative, the myth of "stress" breast cancer will endure in doctors' offices for many years to come. Anytime a person is told that his or her disease is caused by stress or other psychological factors, the first thing to do is ask the physician to provide scientific evidence for his diagnosis. If he can provide no evidence, the second thing to do is find another doctor who is not the captive of harmful medical fables.

Stressful life experiences and risk of relapse of breast cancer: observational cohort study
"This study found no evidence that women who have a severely stressful life experience in the year before being diagnosed with breast cancer, or in the five years afterwards, are at any increased risk of developing a recurrence of their disease. In fact, women who had one or more severely stressful life experiences after diagnosis had a lower risk of recurrence than those who did not. It is perhaps a marginal association, with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval close to 1. However, the only other study to use such detailed assessment of stressful life experiences reported a reduced risk of recurrence among women who had one or more severely stressful life experiences in the 12 months before surgery. These intriguing findings are in the opposite direction to the outcome hypothesised, and it is difficult to formulate a rationale to explain how stressful life experiences might reduce a woman's chance of experiencing a recurrence of her disease."
Graham et al. BMJ 2002;324:1420 (15 June) [emphasis added]
BBC article about this study: Stress 'not linked' to breast cancer relapse


AiA Home
Site Contents

American Iatrogenic Association
2513 S. Gessner, #232
Houston, Texas 77063
www.iatrogenic.org

aia@iatrogenic.org


Why is it that doctors take it as axiomatic that when you've lost your health you've also lost your mind?
> Dennis Potter, "The Singing Detective"

Mad Hatter